Top technology companies, including Google, OpenAI and Stability AI, have agreed to work with anti-child sexual abuse organization Thorn to combat the spread of child sexual abuse images. The court’s decisions in Ferber and Ashcroft could be used to argue that any AI-generated sexually explicit image of real minors should not be protected as free speech given the psychological harms inflicted on the real minors. The court’s ruling in Ashcroft may permit AI-generated sexually explicit images of fake minors. The city of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, was shaken by revelations in December 2023 that two local teenage boys shared hundreds of nude images of girls in their community over a private chat on the social chat platform Discord. Witnesses said the photos easily could have been mistaken for real ones, but they were fake.
Each time a media outlet uses one of these phrases it reinforces a perception that child sexual abuse can be consensual. It also, in turn, helps to diminish the crime and perpetuate the abuse by mutualising the experience of both the perpetrator and the victim involved. Perhaps the most important part of the Ashcroft decision for emerging issues around AI-generated child sexual abuse material was part of the statute that the Supreme Court did not strike down. That provision of the law prohibited “more common and lower tech means of creating virtual (child sexual abuse material), known as computer morphing,” which involves taking pictures of real minors and morphing them into sexually explicit depictions. Learning that someone you know has been viewing child sexual abuse material (child pornography) must have been very shocking, and it’s normal to feel angry, disgusted, scared, or confused – or all of these things at once.
There is no obligation for a child porn website to investigate, but OnlyFans told the BBC it checks social media when verifying accounts. According to Firman, it is not only users and the government who must strive to minimize negative content and harmful effects on digital platforms. Platform providers are also responsible for ensuring that their services are friendly and safe for all people. Child pornography videos are widely circulating on social media, closed groups, messaging applications, and the dark web.
Legal fight against AI-generated child pornography is complicated. A legal scholar explains why
- There is no expected response or feeling after something like this – it affects everyone differently.
- In many states reports can be filed with child protection authorities anonymously which means you can file without providing identifying information about who you are.
- So, I do hope that you have the support of a friend, family member, faith leader, or even your own therapist.
- Some refer to them as “crime scene photos” since the act of photographing the child in this way is criminal.
More and more police departments are establishing Internet Crimes Against Children (ICAC) teams. In most situations you do not need to wait to have “evidence” of child abuse to file a report to child protective services of police. However, it is always best when there is some symptom, behavior or conversation that you can identify or describe to a child protection screener or police officer when making the report.
Illegal pornography
The Internet Watch Foundation has joined with a consortium of partners to develop the Artemis Survivor Hub (ASH) – a revolutionary, victim-focused response to online child sexual exploitation. The Internet Watch Foundation’s powerful new tool for small businesses and startups. Designed to detect and stop known illegal imagery using advanced hash-matching technology, Image Intercept helps eligible companies meet online safety obligations and keep users safe. However, there was also a higher percentage of Category B images that had more than one child. Category B images include those where a child is rubbing genitals (categorised as masturbation) or where there is non-penetrative sexual activity which is where the children are interacting, perhaps touching each other in a sexual manner.
Child sexual abuse does not have to involve physical contact.
These are very young children, supposedly in the safety of their own bedrooms, very likely unaware that the activities they are being coerced into doing are being recorded and saved and ultimately shared multiple times on the internet. Below is the breakdown of the sexual activity seen in the whole sample alongside the activity of those that showed multiple children. Most of the time these children are initially clothed and much of what we see is a quick display of genitals. It could also be that most 3–6-year-olds are not left alone long enough for the discussion and the coercion to get further along, towards full nudity and more severe sexual activity.
In Brazil, the Statute of the Child and Adolescent defines the sale or exhibition of photos and videos of explicit sex scenes involving children and adolescents as a crime. It is also a crime to disseminate these images by any means and to possess files of this type. In SaferNet’s view, anyone who consumes images of child sexual violence is also an accomplice to child sexual abuse and exploitation. However, web crimes against children have become more sophisticated over time, Safernet explained during an event in São Paulo.
